Deaf Architects And Blind Acousticians Pdf

Posted on by admin
Deaf Architects And Blind Acousticians Pdf 7,5/10 7972 reviews
Center

Dec 12, 2008  Buy The last story wii iso. Deaf Architects and Blind Acousticians? A Guide to the Principles of Sound Design on Amazon.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders. A good architect, often with the subsequent help of an acoustic consultant will make sure the design works to fulfil these requirements. It is sometimes said however that you can have deaf architects and blind acousticians, with reference to the fact that what an architect believes to look good, does not necessarily sound great. Deaf Architects and Blind Acousticians? A guide to the Principles of Sound Design (a.k.a. DABA) tried to be little more than a starting point for architects and future architects, acousticians, and planners, as well as any individual who wants to go beyond and appreciation of.

Daniel R Raichel

Robert E Apfel

America

Daniel R Raichel

  1. Ambler SW (2001). The Object Primer: The Application Developer’s Guide to Object Orientation and the UML. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andujar C, Brunet P (1999). The discretized polyhedra simplification: A framework for polyhedra simplification based on decomposition schemes. Technical Report IRI-DT-99-00, Technical University of Catalonia.Google Scholar
  3. Andujar C, Brunet P, Ayala D (2002). Tolopogy-reducing surface simplification using a discrete solid representation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21: 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apfel RE (1992). Deaf Architects & Blind Acousticians: Challenges to Sound Design. Madison, CT, USA: Printworks.Google Scholar
  5. Bassuet A, Rife D, Dellatorre L (2014). Computational and optimization design in geometric acoustics. Building Acoustics, 21: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beranek L (1979). Acoustics of concert halls. Acta Acustica, 1979(4): 251–259. (in Chinese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Beranek L (2004). Concert Halls and Opera Houses. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beranek L (2011). Concert Hall Acoustics. Architectural Science Review, 54: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Booch G, Maksimchuk RA (2007). Object-oriented analysis and design with applications, 3rd edn. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Bork I (2005a). Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation—Part I: Measurements. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91: 740–752.Google Scholar
  11. Bork I (2005b). Report on the 3rd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation—Part II: Calculations. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 91: 753–763.Google Scholar
  12. Burry M (2011). Scripting Culture: Architectural Design and Programming. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Cheng Y (2013). Contemporary Buildings for Performing Arts in Multiple Views. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Dalenbäck BI (2012). Introduction Manual of CATT-Acoustic v9.0. Available at http://www.catt.se/CATT-Acoustic.htm. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
  15. Dritsas D, Rafailaki E (2007). A computational framework for theater design. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference of the Arab Society for Computer Aided Architectural Design (ASCAAD 2007), Alexandria, Egypt, pp. 165–182.Google Scholar
  16. Foged IW, Pasold A, Jensen MB, Poulsen ES (2012). Acoustic environments: Applying evolutionary algorithms for sound based morphogenesis. In: Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2012), Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 347–353.Google Scholar
  17. Janssen P (2004). Design method and computing architecture for generating and evolving building designs. PhD Thesis, Hong Kong Polytech University, Hong Kong, China.Google Scholar
  18. Kouzeleas S, Semidor C (2002). Architectural translation of the acoustical results. In: Proceedings of International Congress of the Institute of Acoustics 2002, London.Google Scholar
  19. Lawson B (2005). How Designers Think: The Design Process, 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Lokki T, Pätynen J, Tervo S, Siltanen S, Savioja L (2011). Engaging concert hall acoustics is made up of temporal envelope preserving reflections. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129: EL223–EL228.Google Scholar
  21. Mahalingam G (1998). The algorithmic auditorium: A computational model for auditorium design. In: Proceedings of 3rd Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 1998), Osaka, Japan, pp. 143–152.Google Scholar
  22. Mahalingam G (1999). A new algorithm for the simulation of sound propagation in spatial enclosures. In: Proceedings of 6th IBPSA International Conference (BS1999), Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  23. Mahalingam G (2003). Representing architectural design using a connections based paradigm, In: Proceedings of Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA 2003), Indianapolis, USA, pp. 270–277.Google Scholar
  24. Microsoft (2015a). SendKeys Class Help. Available at https://msdn.microsoft.com/us-en/library/system.windows.forms. sendkeys.aspx. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
  25. Microsoft (2015b). System. Diagnostics Namespaces Help. Available at https://msdn.microsoft.com/us-en/library/gg145030(v=vs.110).aspx. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
  26. Monks M, Oh B, Dorsey J (2000). Audioptimization: Goal-based acoustic design. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(3): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pehle M, Marek T (2013). SU2CATT Help. Available at http://www.rahe-kraft.de/rk/en/software/su2catt. Accessed 15 July 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Peters B (2010). Acoustic performance as a design driver: Sound simulation and parametric modeling using smart geometry. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 8: 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rindel JH (2000). The use of computer modeling in room acoustics. Journal of Vibroengineering, 3(4): 220–224.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson P, Siltanen S, Lokki T, Savioja L (2014). Concert hall geometry optimization with parametric modeling tools and wave-based acoustic simulations. Building Acoustics, 21: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saksela K, Botts J, Savioja L (2015). Optimization of absorption placement using geometrical acoustic models and least squares. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137: 274–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siltanen S, Lokki T, Savioja L, Lynge C (2008). Geometry reduction in room acoustics modeling. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 94: 410–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spaeth B, Menges A (2010). Performative design for spatial acoustic: Concept for an evolutionary design algorithm based on acoustics as design driver, In: Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe 2010), Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 461–468.Google Scholar
  34. Szalapaj P (2005). Contemporary Architecture and the Digital Design Process. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  35. Vorländer M (1995). International round robin on room acoustical computer simulations. In: Proceedings of 15th International Congress on Acoustics, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 689–692.Google Scholar
  36. Wei L, Zhang Q, Xu Z, Zhang X (2012). Coming out of the misunderstandings of digital design technologies. Architectural Journal, 2012(9): 1–6. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Xu S (2011a). A design study of auditoriums based on CAAD. Master Thesis, Tsinghua University, China. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Xu W (2011b). Parametric design and form generating with algorithms. World Architecture, 2011(6): 110–111. (in Chinese)Google Scholar